be_ixf;ym_202109 d_19; ct_50

Pompeii: Exploration vs Preservation

SHARE


WRITTEN BY

lhanson
Jul 12, 2012


TOPIC
Culture, Education

Pompeii: Exploration vs Preservation

Visitors still populate the downtown area of ancient Pompeii.

As part of the post-Italy day of reflections, Gwen Conis from the University of Virginia, Sam Hillis from Cal State University Fullerton, and Naomi Newman from Arizona State University host a panel on the ethics of archeology. The question they pose is, at what cost should we be able to explore Pompeii for ourselves?

Pompeii, the city that was famously buried by ash from the eruption of Mt. Vesuvius in AD 79, is one of the few places where we can get a snapshot of a typical ancient city. It was a thriving port city with shops, restaurants, theaters, temples, a forum, and an amphitheater – it’s all still there.

It’s been over 200 years since Pompeii was discovered. Since then more than two thirds of the city has been uncovered, some portions more carefully than others. Today over two million tourists visit the site every year to experience what it might have been like to live at that time.

Unfortunately, this has a down side. After being preserved for almost two millennium the exposed remains now suffer from weather, light, foot traffic, vandalism and outright theft by visitors wanting to take a piece of this historic site home. It has been a challenge to fight against these forces and to continue to preserve the integrity of the frescoes and walls. Some buildings have even collapsed.

During the panel students weigh the the pros and cons of the current situation. The exposure of the Pompeii site means less will be available for future archeologists and visitors. Some students argue that there is no need to preserve it now that we have gathered what we can about the ancient city.  Other students feel strongly that in order to feel connected to history, they need to have a physical experience, not just to read about Pompeii in a book or study it online.

This debate applies to many archeological sites. Join our onboard conversation and let us know your thoughts. What do you think the priority should be; visitor interaction or preservation? Can you suggest alternative solutions?

Students explore the large theater in Pompeii. Dignitaries would sit in the first three rows, followed by the wealthy, commoners, and finally women in the back row. The once brilliant marble floors of the theater are now dulled by the feet of visitors.
Pompeii was one of the first cities to standardize the width of its streets and the carriages that traveled on them. As a result, the streets are worn from heavy travel.
The main bakery in town used an oven similar to that which makes the now famous Neapolitan pizza. The roof and much of the plaster walls have been eroded and destroyed by weather and visitors.
CONNECT WITH US

One Comment

  1. Linda Gilmartin
    July 22, 2012 at 11:45 am

    We had the great fortune of touring Italy with our daughter, Alianna, who is sailing on the Summer 2012 Voyage. Pompeii was one of the many historical sites we visited. Experiencing firsthand the archeological sites and realizing their historical significance, to me, was and still is awe-inspiring. As I stood upon the sites that were built in Roman times, I found myself marveling at the craftsmanship of the marble columns, mosaic floors, statues, and architectural design of the many buildings. I loved being able to experience a part of history that I studied in school many years before, from the Colosseum and Roman Forum to the Acropolis in Greece. Preservation would ensure future generations the continued opportunity to experience the magnificence and symbolism each historical site holds.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More From Culture

More From Education

Back To News Home